A fresh leak of benchmark tests of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU revealed that it’s 18% faster than the vanilla 7950X and 12% faster than Intel’s Core i9-13900K in these tests.

This comes from a leaker, chi11eddog, who earlier posted a number of claims regarding the MSI. Though the results from this new test are astonishing, there are metadata involved in his report – like the motherboard models, BIOS versions, or memory specs used for testing – thus, it shouldn’t be considered significantly.

Benchmark Testing of Ryzen 9 7950X3D

For a long, Intel has been thriving in the game of semiconductors with its superior chips. But over the past decade, players like AMD have been growing sharply to encounter Intel in all the ways possible, including in its main game of high-end CPU offerings.

As we see both the OEMs competing neck-to-neck now, AMD is seen slightly advancing with its new Ryzen 9 7950X3D chip. While the company is yet to announce this series – containing Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 9 7950X – benchmark tests for Ryzen 9 7950X3D have leaked today, showcasing its power.

This comes from a reliable hardware leaker, “chi11eddog”, who in the past shared several leaks of MSI. The chip is compared against the vanilla variant of Ryzen 9 7950X (comes without 3D V-Cache) and Intel’s Core i9-13900K CPU, on five games – Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Far Cry 5, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, and Star Control.

The test is set to 1080p resolution with high-quality image settings, and the results are as follows. chi11eddog noted Ryzen 9 7950X3D performing 18% faster than 7950X and 12% faster than Core i9-13900K in his tests. Though it’s applauding, he didn’t mention any other data concerning the tests, like motherboard models, BIOS versions, or memory specs.

Thus, these results should be considered as a pinch of salt. The leaker also shared a Cinebench R23 score and CPU-Z/Ryzen Master screenshot, showing that someone has the 7950X3D processor with MSI X670E Tomahawk motherboard, resulting in the CPU scoring 37973 points in the multi-core test.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here